Breaking News

Singapore Court issues groundbreaking decision concerning bill of lading instrument for bunkering sector

Image Credits: Manifold Times

Repost: The following article by Singapore bunkering publication Manifold Times represents the summary of a recent 49-page written judgement issued by the Singapore Court of Appeal:

The Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore on Friday (20 August) issued a groundbreaking decision concerning the nature of bills of lading (BLs) issued to bunker barges delivering marine fuel to oceangoing vessels around the Port of Singapore.

Background

LunaZmagaNepamoraStar QuestPetro Asia and Arowana Milan (collectively, the bunker barges) loaded bunkers from Vopak Terminal between 10 to 29 October 2014. Upon loading, Vopak Terminal generated several documents in respect of the bunkers, including a Certificate of Quantity (C/Q) and a document issued triplicated title “Bill of Lading” (Vopak BLs). The Vopak BLs were required to be signed and stamped by the master of the bunker barges.

The bunkers were sold by Phillips 66 International Trading Pte Ltd to OW Bunker Far East (Singapore) Pte Ltd and Dynamic Oil Trading (Singapore) Pte Ltd (both collectively, the buyers) who nominated the bunker barges for loading at Vopak Terminal.

However, the buyers’ parent company OW Bunker A/S became insolvent on 6 November 2014 and the buyers defaulted on payment to Phillips 66.

The development caused Phillips 66 to demand delivery (i.e. payment) of marine fuel from the bunker barges’ owners leading to the vessels’ arrests between 14 to 17 November 2014.

While Phillips 66 contended the Vopak BLs were typical bills of lading and ought to be given their full force as such, the bunker barges’ owners submitted the Vopak BLs merely functioned as acknowledgements of the receipt of bunkers and did not operate as contractual documents and/or as documents of title.

Initial Decision of Singapore High Court (in favour of Phillips 66)

Following an 18-day trial concluding on 30 January 2020, a Judge at the High Court of the Republic of Singapore stated “that the Vopak BLs had contractual force and functioned as typical bills of lading”.

Four principal reasons were given by the Judge for this conclusion.

  1. The phrase “bunkers for ocean going vessels” contained in the Vopak BLs was not void for uncertainty. In the Judge’s view, this phrase referred to ocean-going vessels in or around the port of Singapore.
  2. The lack of an antecedent contract of carriage between Phillips 66 and the bunker tankers’ owners did not stand in the way of the Vopak BLs having contractual force, as there was no reason in principle why the Vopak BL could not itself be the contract.
  3. There was no inherent inconsistency between the contemplation of multiple deliveries of sub-parcels to different vessels and the issuance of only one set of Vopak BLs covering the entire parcel.
  4. It was no defence for the bunker tankers’ owners to claim that it was impossible for them to comply with their obligations under the Vopak BLs without breaching their obligations to the buyers, and vice versa.

Final Decision of Singapore Court of Appeal (in favour of bunker barges’ owners)

The bunker barges’ owners took the case to the Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore, where the Court highlighted the central issue in the appeals to be concerning the precise nature of the Vopak BLs.

“The modern bill of lading serves three functions: it operates as (a) a receipt by the carrier acknowledging the shipment of goods on a particular vessel for carriage to a particular destination; (b) a memorandum of the terms of the contract of carriage; and (c) a document of title to the goods,” stated the judgement.

“In this case, the question for this court’s consideration is whether, in addition to being a receipt for the shipment of the bunkers, the Vopak BLs were also intended to function as contracts of carriage and/or as documents of title.

“It is important to bear in mind that in this case, the court is not simply construing a particular term of the Vopak BL. Instead, it is ascertaining the parties’ intentions behind the issuance of the Vopak BLs, specifically, whether the parties had intended for the Vopak BLs to have contractual force and to operate as documents of title. This goes towards the existence of a contract, rather than its interpretation. This is an important distinction.”

The underlying sale arrangements between Phillips 66 and the buyers

“Here, the Vopak BLs were issued in respect of bunkers sold by the respondent [Phillips 66] to the Buyers under the sale contracts. Given that the Vopak BLs were inextricably connected to the sale contracts, it is apposite to first examine the commercial arrangements between the respondent and the Buyers under these sale contracts,” said the Court of Appeal.

The Court of Appeal found several features of the sale contracts to be salient:

  1. the buyers were given a 30-day credit period by the respondent;
  2. payment was required to be made by the buyers against the presentation of the respondent’s commercial invoice and the original CQ or a letter of indemnity (LOI);
  3. title to and possession of the bunkers passed to the buyers upon loading;
  4. there was a conspicuous absence of any reference to bills of lading in the terms of the sale contracts; and
  5. the buyers gave delivery instructions to the bunker barge owners, and Phillips 66 knew that deliveries would be made shortly after loading such that any attempt to demand delivery of the bunkers after the credit period expired would be futile.

Vopak BLs as between Philipps 66 and the buyers

These sale arrangements showed that, as the Judge found, Phillips 66 had no real obligation to transfer the Vopak BLs to the buyers for payment. Nor were the buyers expecting to receive the Vopak BLs for the purposes of claiming delivery of the bunkers. It followed that Phillips 66 and the buyers could not have intended for the buyers to be able to lawfully deal with the bunkers only upon presentation of an original Vopak BL. Rather, the buyers could deal with the bunkers as soon as they were loaded on board the Vessels.

The Court of Appeal therefore stated that, as between Phillips 66 and the buyers, the Vopak BL was “a non-essential document with no contractual force and had no effect as a contract of carriage or as a document of title. It did not and could not serve the traditional functions of a bill of lading.”

Vopak BLs as between Phillips 66 and the bunker barge owners

In light of Phillips 66’s commercial arrangements with the buyers, it knew the Vopak BLs would not allow it to regain possession of the bunkers it had sold by presenting the same to the bunker tankers’ owners and demanding delivery, said the Court of Appeal.

“It is apparent that the bunkers were delivered to various ocean-going vessels very shortly after they were loaded on board the Vessels [bunker tankers], well before the expiry of the 30-day credit period,” the Court of Appeal stated.

“There were also occasions of commingling of bunkers and cases where the Vessels returned to load another shipment of bunkers even before the 30-day credit period had expired. This is accepted by the respondent [Phillips 66].

“In our view, this would have indicated to the respondent that the bunkers were being discharged shortly after loading without production of the Vopak BLs, since it was still in possession of the Vopak BLs at the material time.

“Notwithstanding that its purported rights as the lawful holder of the Vopak BLs were ostensibly being infringed, the respondent only sought to demand delivery of the bunkers under the Vopak BLs after it found out about the Buyers’ insolvency, ie, the very risk it had accepted when it extended 30-day credit terms to the Buyers.

“All of this shows that the respondent had always looked to the Buyers for payment, rather than regarded the Vopak BLs as security against the risk of non-payment.

“Notably, this would also have been known by the appellants [bunker barges’ owners] who, as the carriers loading and discharging the bunkers bought and sold, were active participants in the commercial arrangements between the respondent and the Buyers.

“Therefore, when the Vopak BLs were issued, neither the respondent nor the appellants could have intended for delivery of the bunkers to be made only upon presentation of an original Vopak BL.”

Vopak BL terms not representative of traditional BLs

Judges found the Vopak BLs containing several features that were atypical of traditional BLs which reinforce the view that they were not intended by the parties to operate as such.

They explained the Vopak BLs did not specify a destination of discharge but instead relied on insertion of the phrase “bunkers for ocean going vessels” which suggests the parties intended to omit a destination altogether; unlike traditional BLs which specify a location for discharge.

“This fundamental difference between the Vessels’ carriage of the bunkers and a typical contract of carriage suggests that the Vopak BLs were no ordinary bills of lading, and had not been intended by the parties to operate as such,” the Judges wrote.

“In our judgment, the significance of the absence of a port of destination is not to show that the Vopak BLs were void for uncertainty but rather to illustrate the point that the Vopak BLs were not intended to function as contracts of carriage and/or as documents of title.”

They added: “In this regard, the omission of a destination in the Vopak BLs represents a significant departure from ordinary practice, from which it may be inferred that the parties did not intend for the Vopak BLs to operate as typical bills of lading, either in terms of being contracts of carriage or documents of title.”

Allocation of Non-Payment Risk

Phillips 66 clearly accepted risk of the buyer’s non-payment by extending credit to them and by deliberately omitting to stipulate for the use of traditional bills of lading under the sale contracts, according to the Judges.

Additionally, the parties including Phillips 66 expressly agreed the Vopak BLs would play no role in facilitating the delivery of the bunkers to the buyers or their order.

As such, the risk of non-payment thus arose as a direct decision by Phillips 66 to extend credit and not to stipulate for the use of bills of lading under the underlying sale contracts.

“By such conduct, the respondent [Phillips 66] effectively took the position that the Vopak BL would not operate as a key to the warehouse,” they explained.

“In other words, by reason of the terms of the underlying sale contracts, the respondent elected to leave the warehouse ‘unlocked’.”

“It is therefore absurd to suggest that the respondent’s decision to accept the risk of non-payment by the Buyers could, in any way at all, result in the transfer of that risk to the carrier [owner of bunker tankers].”

Based on the evidence before the court, the Judges further found it “untenable” for Phillips 66 to suggest the bunker tankers’ owners agreeing to assume the risk of non-payment by the Buyers by engaging in the transaction.

“This would effectively mean that the appellants had agreed to a situation whereby they would be in breach of their obligations to the respondent under the presentation rule in every case,” they added.

Phillips 66’s argument of having the bunker tankers’ owners obtaining LOIs from the relevant parties was “unworkable” and “unrealistic”.

“From the Buyers’ perspective, they already had title to and possession of the bunkers pursuant to the sale contracts. Nor could the appellants obtain LOIs from the ocean-going vessels. These vessels were purchasing bunkers for their own consumption, rather than loading cargo for transhipment pursuant to a bill of lading contract,” the Judges stated.

“Indeed, there is no credible evidence that LOIs were ever obtained by the appellants or by other bunker barges in the ex-wharf bunker industry. The absence of any such evidence attests to the impracticability of such a practice.

“Furthermore, even if the appellants could have obtained LOIs from the relevant parties, they would still remain liable vis-à-vis the shipper and would assume the risk of recovery under the relevant LOI. This is no simple or sure process.

“Where the buyer itself has become insolvent (as in the present case involving one of the largest bunker traders in the world), the carrier’s prospects of recovering its losses from the buyer would be slim, if not non-existent.”

Note: Manifold Times has arranged an interview with award winning Singapore-based shipping and international commodity trade law firm Helmsman LLC that successfully acted for the owner of Zmaga, Nepamora, Star Quest, Petro Asia and Arowana Milan to discuss how the above judgement will affect the bunkering industry.

 

Source:
Manifold Times

 

Marine Online Media Team
Please email us at marketing@marineonline.com to contact the author for this article.

Marine online bunkering

Check Also

Hapag-Lloyd Sees Small Gain in First-Half Bunker Consumption as Fuel Price Gains 67%

Image Credit: Ship & Bunker Repost: Container line Hapag-Lloyd saw a small increase in its …

10 Situs Bo Togel Terpercaya Daftar Nama Situs BO Togel Online Terpercaya 2022 Situs Togel Resmi situs togel terpercaya situs togel terpercaya 10 Situs Bandar Togel Terpercaya 10 Situs Togel Dengan Agen Togel Terpercaya Toto Slot : Judi Slot Bola Terpercaya 2022 Situs Bandar Toto Togel Slot Deposit Dana Nama 10 Agen Situs Togel Online Resmi dan Terpercaya PUBTOGEL : Main Togel Termurah Di 10 Situs Togel Terpercaya Daftar Slot Gacor Situs Toto Online situs togel terpercaya situs togel terpercaya slot deposit dana 10 situs togel terpercaya Slot Gacor Deposit Dana 10 Situs Togel Toto Main Togel Murah Di 10 Situs Togel Terpercaya Daftar Nama Bandar Bo 10 Situs Togel Terpercaya 2022 | Namatogel Daftar Slot Deposit Dana 10 Situs Togel Terpercaya Situs Bandar Togel Terpercaya situs slot gacor slot deposit dana situs togel terpercaya situs togel terpercaya rtp slot situs togel terpercaya Nama Nama Situs Togel Terpercaya 2022 Bandar Togel Terlengkap Bandar Togel Resmi Situs Bandar Togel Resmi 2022 Slot Online Demo Gratis Nama Bandar Togel Terpercaya Situs Slot Gacor Deposit Dana Terbaik Di Indonesia Bandar Togel Terpercaya Situs Bandar Togel Terpercaya Situs Slot Deposit Dana, OVO, Gopay, Linkaja Slot Gacor Bandar Togel Terpercaya Saat Ini situs slot gacor Slot Deposit Dana Situs Slot Terpercaya Gacor 10 Situs Togel Terpercaya Situs Togel Terpercaya Daftar 9 Situs Togel Terpercaya Bandar Judi Togel Online Singapore Resmi Terpercaya Slot Deposit Dana 10 Situs Togel Terpercaya SITUS JUDI TOGEL ONLINE TERPERCAYA DI INDONESIA Slot Deposit Via Dana Ewallet Info Freebet Hari Ini slot deposit dana 7 Situs Togel Online Slot Demo situs togel toto macau Bandar Togel Terpercaya Situs Togel Online Togel Macau Daftar Bandar Togel Terpercaya Dan terbaik Di Indonesia situs togel terpercaya situs judi bola situs togel terpercaya situs togel terpercaya 10 Situs Bandar Togel Hadiah 4D 10 Juta Resmi Terpercaya Daftar Situs Togel Terpercaya Di Indonesia 2022 Bandar Togel Terpercaya 10 Daftar Situs Togel Terpercaya Slot Gacor Hari ini Slot Demo Daftar Nama 10 Situs Bo Togel Online Terpercaya Slot gacor Gampang Maxwin Situs Togel Terpercaya Dan Resmi Situs Togel Terpercaya Daftar 9 Situs Togel Terpercaya Bandar Judi Togel Online Singapore Resmi Terpercaya Situs Slot Online Gacor slot deposit dana situs togel terpercaya slot demo situs togel terpercaya slot deposit dana slot online Situs Togel Resmi Judi Bola Online 10 Web Situs Togel Terpercaya 10 Situs Agen Togel Terpercaya Live Draw HK Live Draw SGP Situs Slot Deposit Dana Polisi Togel Bandar Judi Togel Online Singapore Resmi Terpercaya Slot Demo Agen Togel Terpercaya Hadiah Terbesar Situs Judi Bola SBOBET 10 Situs Togel terpercaya dan terbesar situs togel terpercaya 10 situs togel Slot Deposit Dana SITUS JUDI SLOT ONLINE GACOR DI INDONESIA Bandar Togel Hadiah 2D 100 Ribu Rupiah Terpercaya Dan Teraman Situs Bandar Togel Terpercaya Deposit Dana BARTOGEL Situs Judi Togel Online Terpercaya Bandar Togel Terpercaya Situs Bo Togel Resmi SITUS JUDI TOGEL ONLINE TERPERCAYA DI INDONESIA Bandar Togel Terpercaya Saat Ini Kumpulan Slot Gacor Terbesar Di Indonesia 2022 Bandar Togel Terpercaya Saat Ini situs togel terpercaya Bandar Togel Dengan Hadiah Terbesar EDM Togel Hasil Slot situs togel situs togel terpercaya Judi Slot Gacor Deposit Dana Termurah Daftar Nama Bandar Togel Terpercaya Bandar Toto Resmi Terpercaya 5 Agen Bandar Togel Terpercaya situs togel slot deposit dana situs togel terpercaya situs togel terpercaya slot deposit pulsa slot deposit dana slot gacor 5 Bandar Togel Terpercaya Agen Judi Bola Terpercaya Bandar Togel Terpercaya DEMO SLOT PRAGMATIC 5 Situs Togel Terpercaya 5 Situs Toto Resmi slot deposit pulsa situs togel terpercaya
situs togel terpercaya situs togel terpercaya 10 situs togel terpercaya situs togel terpercaya slot deposit dana situs togel situs togel terpercaya slot deposit dana situs togel terpercaya situs slot gacor situs togel terpercaya situs judi bola Daftar 10 Nama Situs Togel Terpercaya Dengan Bandar Togel Resmi Terbaik Di Indonesia situs togel terpercaya slot deposit dana situs togel terpercaya situs togel terpercaya situs togel terpercaya situs togel terpercaya 10 situs togel terpercaya situs togel terpercaya slot deposit pulsa situs judi bola slot deposit pulsa slot deposit dana situs togel terpercaya slot deposit dana situs judi bola situs togel terpercaya situs judi bola slot deposit dana slot deposit pulsa situs togel terpercaya slot deposit pulsa dana slot depo dana bandar togel terpercaya Situs togel terpercaya slot online gacor Bandar Togel Terpercaya slot gacor slot deposit dana polisi togel Polisi togel Bandar Togel Terpercaya Bandar Togel Terpercaya slot deposit dana 10rb Bandar Togel Terpercaya Situs Togel Terpercaya Situs Togel Terpercaya slot gacor bandar togel situs slot depo 10k situs slot depo 10k Slot Online Depo 10k slot demo Bandar Togel Terpercaya Situs Togel Terpercaya Slot Deposit Dana Slot Gacor slot demo slot deposit dana Bandar Togel Terpercaya slot gacor Slot Deposit Pulsa Daftar Slot Gacor Bandar Togel Terpercaya Slot Dana 10k slot deposit pulsa tanpa potongan slot gacor Bandar Togel Terpercaya Bandar Togel Hadiah 4d 10 juta Bandar Togel Terpercaya Situs Togel Terpercaya live draw toto macau live draw cambodia live draw china live draw hk live draw sgp live draw sdy live draw taiwan 10 situs togel terpercaya Bandar Togel Terpercaya slot deposit dana bandar togel slot gacor Slot Online Pulsa Slot Online Gacor Bandar Togel Terpercaya slot depo 10k Slot Deposit Pulsa Daftar Slot Deposit Dana Bandar Togel Hadiah 4d 10 juta Terpercaya Bandar Togel Terpercaya Slot Deposit Pulsa slot deposit pulsa Live Result SDY Live Result SGP Live Result HK Situs Togel Terpercaya bandar togel terpercaya Daftar Slot Dana Bandar Togel Terpercaya 10 Situs Togel Terpercaya Live Draw SGP Tercepat Hari Ini Live Draw SDY Tercepat Hari Ini Live Draw HK Tercepat Hari Ini Situs Togel Terpercaya Slot Terpercaya Bandar Togel Online Terpercaya Indonesia Daftar Togel Terpercaya Bandar Togel Terpercaya Daftar Slot Situs Togel Terpercaya Slot Pulsa Daftar Bandar Togel Terpercaya Slot Dana Via Dana Slot Gacor Slot Demo Pragmatic slot online Slot Via Dana Bandar Togel Terpercaya Bandar Togel Terpercaya slot deposit pulsa Slot Deposit Dana Bandar Togel Terpercaya Bandar Togel Terpercaya Slot Deposit Pulsa Tanpa Potongan Slot Dana RTP Slot Live Slot Deposit Pulsa Slot Deposit Dana Bandar Togel Terpercaya Slot Deposit Dana Bandar Togel Terpercaya Bandar Togel Bonus Cashback Terbesar Bandar Togel Terperaya Slot Deposit Pulsa Live Draw Tercepat Bandar Togel Terpercaya Slot Deposit Pulsa Tanpa Potongan Slot Deposit Dana Bandar Togel Terpercaya Bocoran Slot Gacor Hari Ini Slot Demo Data HK, Hongkong Pools Bandar Togel Terpercaya Slot Online Demo slot gacor Daftar Bandar Togel Terpercaya Slot Deposit Pulsa Situs BO Togel Terpercaya Situs Togel Terpercaya Prediksi HK Live Draw HK Situs Slot Online ESMI SLOT Bandar Togel Terpercaya Situs Togel Terpercaya Slot Deposit Dana slot gacor 5 Bandar Togel Terpercaya Situs Slot Online Deposit Pulsa Agen Togel Terpercaya Bonus besar 2022 Slot Gacor Depo 10rb Terbaik IRAMA SLOT Daftar Bandar Togel 2022 Terbaik Terpercaya Hongkong slot deposit pulsa Prediksi Togel Prediksi Togel Hongkong Prediksi Togel Sydney Prediksi Togel Singapore Angka Keramat Prediksi HK Prediksi SGP Prediksi SDY Prediksi HK SGP SDY Prediksi Togel HK SGP SDY Ratu Prediksi Master prediksi Bandar Togel Terpercaya Tiraijd Data Sdy prediksi HK Daftar Slot Live Draw HK Prediksi HK Prediksi SGP Prediksi SDY Bandar Togel Terpercaya 5 Bandar Togel Terpercaya Daftar Bandar Togel Terpercaya 5 Bandar Togel Terbaik Live Draw Cambodia Live Draw HK Live Draw SGP Live Draw SDY Live Draw HK Live Draw SGP Live Draw SDY Live Draw Taiwan Live Draw Toto Macau Live Draw Toto Macau Data SGP Live Draw Cambodia Data HK Live Draw China Live Draw Taiwan Live Draw SGP Paito SGP Paito HK Paito SDY Data SGP Live Draw HK Live Draw HK 6D Live Draw SGP Live Draw Singapore Live Draw Sydney Live Draw SDY Live Draw Cambodia Live Draw Taiwan Live Draw Toto Macau Paito SGP Bandar Togel Slot Online Togel Online Slot Deposit Pulsa Prediksi HK Prediksi HK Prediksi Togel Live Draw HK Data SDY Situs Togel Bandar Togel Terpercaya Bandar Togel Terpercaya Data HK Live Draw SDY Live Draw Sydney Live Draw Cambodia Live Draw Cambodia Live Draw SGP Live Draw SGP Live Draw Taiwan Live Draw Taiwan Live Draw China Live Draw China Live Draw China Live Draw China Hasil Slot Gacor Data SDY Data SGP Slot Pulsa Bandar Togel Terpercaya Slot Deposit Dana Prediksi HK Slot Deposit Dana Slot Deposit Dana Slot Deposit Pulsa Slot Deposit Dana Slot Gacor Dana Live Draw Cambodia Prediksi Suhu Togel Polisi Togel Live Draw Hk Live Draw Hk Bandar Togel Terpercaya Dan Terbaik